|
WSUS SUS Wiki Community ..[[windows backup software]] |
WSUS does not solve all the patch management needs for all customer. The following is a list of desired WSUS features. Feel free to add more wishes to this list - be sure to give as much details on your wish, and why such a feature would be usefull to you and other WSUS customers.
Comments:From anon - 4/12/07 4:38 PM For those of you having trouble with installing updates on the machines of regular users - if you have them log off but leave the machine powered on, the updates will be installed automatically. Also, any reboots needed will happen at this time as well.
From timwiser - 3/26/07 6:10 AM It would be great to have an option to make the client install patches before the logon stage. For example, a blue screen saying "Please wait whilst update 1 of 3 is installed..." would be preferable to having the user interrupted during a logon session by the "Updates have been installed..." message asking for them to reboot.
From EdwardQ - 3/22/07 11:02 AM Not Sure how to add new Wish List item. I don't see this one on the list or can figure out if wsus 2.0 has it. But I like to, easily, be able to tell when a update is updated on a computer. This can help trouble shoot issues if you wonder when and what was updated last.
From huntergatherer - 9/6/06 12:50 PM jlkobielusz,
Create a GPO for your "Testing" group and put it at the top level. Remove authenticated users from the GPO. Add Only the PCs to the GPO and make sure that the GPOs are processed in the correct order. This is how I do it. You gan also create a group and populate it with the PCs and put that group on the GPO, the only problem is that in order for the computers to know that they are a member or no longer a member of that group is to reboot them.
--HG-- From jlkobielusz - 9/5/06 9:39 AM Our site has only been using WSUS for about a couple months now and think it's a great administrative tool. We use GPO's within our site for clients, servers, and another for selective exclusions. Without requiring the use of a separate OU or disconnected system, it would be nice to be able to create a target group of machines for testing released patches prior to deploying them across the board to everyone. The only ways I currently know of are to put them all in a separate OU and apply a GPO to the clients with the desired settings or do my testing in the off-line network (Where the world is always perfect :) The problems with patches always seem to pop up on the production network and without staggering the times for GPO's to target computer groups or being a little creative with the policies or AD structure, it can be time consuming to recover from a difficult patch. If there were any way to test the deployment to a few members of each existing computer group prior to a full scale assault on the clients, it would definitely be less destructive than recovereing later. Of course, with my limited knowledge of the product, if anyone has any other recommendations, I would appreciate the inputs. Thank you. From huntergatherer - 7/18/06 9:23 AM It would be great if I can run a specified command before and or after the updates. This would be verry useful in putting MOM or any other Monitoring server in maintnance mode.
From Mikka - 6/28/06 5:00 AM it doesnt seem that wiki links get parsed when using comments. the page is here: http://wsuswiki.com/ContentOnNetworkDrive
From Mikka - 6/28/06 5:00 AM I have a solution for wish list #30 here: [[ContentOnNetworkDrive]]
From cjwallace - 6/18/06 5:49 AM It would be nice to see a proper solution for WSUS to have Wake On Lan. WSUS is such a great product but the fact that you have to use 3rd party tools to wake machines to apply patches is a real pain. it would be nice to have it all part of one product.
From vishwa - 5/24/06 4:19 PM Hi, when i open the home pages of wsus i,e https://servername/wsusadmin I get a notifications at the bottom.
Can any body help me From pepitoe - 5/24/06 10:25 AM Install on next restart/shutdown From protofj - 5/15/06 9:34 AM Advanaced reporting across servers: I really need to be able to report the status of machines according to group regardless of which upstream or downstream server they are connecting to. Specifcally we currently have three wsus servers (two downstream) with several computer groups setup. I need to be able to create a report that shows the status of ALL computers in a group across all 3 servers.
From CharlesR - 2/2/06 1:14 PM SuperSyl, so would I. I'd love to have it like my AD structure so when I add depts to the deployment I can put them in their main group. We still have some depts on ISDN or dialup and will add them as fiber is installed. From SuperSyl - 1/31/06 11:40 AM I'm very interesting to have the possibility to create subfolder group in computer group. From gigafunk - 1/11/06 11:51 AM I wish the wsus admin page had a download from directory option where I could syncro the updates on an offline wsus server from a copy of the data directory from an online one. Wsus current offline synco method stinks, and gives me access denied errors.
From maximillianx - 12/12/05 4:48 PM The ability to reconcile AD computer accounts with WSUS clients. Perhaps an enhanced 'cleanstalecomputers' tool, but interfaced directly within WSUS?
From rialtus - 12/8/05 3:52 PM I want to recind my last comment - the option I was looking for was buried at the bottom of the Synchronization options page.
From rialtus - 12/2/05 10:04 AM I owuld like to see a better way of addressing replicas. For example, if we purchase a new company that also has a WSUS infrastructure and we're trying to collapse them into one, it's not feasible because the only place to change replica settings in during installation. The same is true of the reverse -- we want to sell a company and have them take their own WSUS server without rebuilding it. This was a feature that I used in SUS (albeit for different reasons), and I would love to see it in WSUS. From Imurphy - 11/29/05 3:35 AM You can force an update using wuauclt /detectnow .... on machines which are running the correct version. There isn't any way of knowing if they are running the correct version except to start examinging exe version numbers.
However if nothing happens you have to start digging around to work out whats going on. The new wsusclientdiag has been a great improvement, but why not just build this all into the client?
How about some extra switches:
wuauclt /interactive to display what its doing
wuauclt /debug similar
wuauclt /version to display the version of the client
(in case of future changes)
wuauclt /installallnow to install all patches without further ado
wuauclt /rebootafterinstall once finished reboot
I'm thinking of the installation of a new machine where you connect it to a network and then have to update it. I would be handy to be able to log in, open a window and type
wuauclt /installnow /yes /rebootafterinstall
While at the moment its *much better* than the old manual patching used to be, if you have to install batches of 10 or more machines it does makes life easier.... and its not as if it implies any great changes.
Graphical or command line would be good, doesn't matter.
Does the wuauclt have to be such a shy beast, bring it out in the open!
From Imurphy - 11/29/05 3:24 AM And how about a getting rid of the wsusadmin/ bit we have to type on the end.
At the moment the default install creates an admin page in http://server:8530/wsusadmin/. I usually make a couple of dns and iis changes to replace this with the much easier http://wsus.org.local/wsusadmin/.
Would it not be possible to add a simple default.aspx to the root which redirects to /wsusadmin/ ? Then we could all just use http://wsus.mydomain.local/
From Imurphy - 11/29/05 2:57 AM Harolds comment above touches on the problems which affect SBS. I'm not quite sure why the wsus client has to connect to http://computername/selfupdate.aspx and not just use the same address as specified in the group policy but it causes no end of problems.
I'd like to add the ability to remove items from the content library. If you make a mistake and approve, lets say, office 2000 patches, it downloads everything but there is then no way to remove them. This probably doesn't affect english language sistems very much but on non-english sistems its very easy to make a mistake and end up with several gb of patches which you cannot easily remove.
How about a reminder email as well. If you have 10-15 wsus systems to maintain its easy to forget to connect to one to approve patches. You may be aware that patches have come out but tracking which of the sistems you maintain has had its patches approved is essentially manual.
From maximillianx - 11/14/05 9:23 AM As there is the ability to filter against a particular update, I would like the ability to filter against a particular computer from the reports (or computers) screen.
From DavidRa - 9/20/05 5:59 PM The command line installation mode needs to accept the appropriate options for deploying replica servers.
I'm presently rolling out over 170 WSUS replica servers - but to automate installation of WSUS in replica mode required writing a VBS script that clicks on the appropriate buttons in the UI (SendKeys).
Surely if you're deploying replica servers you want to automate it?
Also, we need a WSUS command line administration tool - not for update approval but for configuration of options / synchronisation so that scripted deployment of the server can initiate sync and then set the scheduled sync time.
From ArmyAnts - 8/26/05 3:48 AM Regarding:
From pepitoe - 2005-06-30 10:22 AM ...- a way to delete custom view filters You probably found this already, if not or for others who may be looking - click "Updates", select your custom view in Products and classifications, click the link "Change custom view", when you're viewing the custom view you'll have a delete button at the bottom.
From mbakunas - 8/25/05 12:27 PM I'd like to see the ability to grant access to the reports without making a user a full administrator of WSUS. From Harald - 8/18/05 5:06 AM Another SelfUpdate Wish - Hi, i've noticed, that SelfUpdate is configured during Setup at http://%computername%/selfupdate. My wish would be to add a textbox to the setup, which allows to enter a different name for the machine part of the SelfUpdate URL. This would allow to use the IIS ability to run on a different IP address than the host system in full extent. In my case the regular ip and port 80 of the host system is captured by a different service. Since i've no other choice at the moment, i've setup a DNS record with a different Name and IP Address for WSUS. My GPOs are pointing to that name and the IIS Server with WSUS installed to the default site, is listing on that Ip-Address. Additionally i've changed the addresses listed in httpcfg to the proper one plus localhost. Everything is working smooth for me, except, that the SoftwareDistribution.Log records errors when contacting http://%computername%/selfupdate. This error also shows up as Task in WSUS Admin. Again, everything works fine, obviously except a script, which checks the mentioned URL instead of the real name of the WSUS. So either a DNS query for the name of the IP Address of the site or a way to enter the DNS Name during the setup, would be highly appreciated. From maximillianx - 8/3/05 2:18 PM SNMP and/or perf counters I'd like to see values showing total computers, computers needing updates, etc. (most of what the API can pull) available via perfcounters or SNMP for monitoring solutions.
From Virulon - 7/19/05 9:45 AM BSA, I guess I need a visual (that's the kind of learning I am, visual/hands on). I also spoke the to WSUS at TechEd and they are a great bunch so if they understood your request and said it can't be done currently, then you have a valid desire for an enhancement request. Best of luck with it.
From bsa - 7/18/05 10:58 AM My goal is to have the servers download content from MS but get approval settings from an upstream server. The clients would then be pointed to a local server for content and settings. I talked with the WSUS team at TechEd and they told me the configuration I want isn't currently available, so I guess it belongs here on the wish list. The point is that this configuration would cut the WAN/Internet (same thing for us) bandwidth usage for WSUS by about 50%. From Virulon - 7/16/05 9:42 AM BSA, I think what you are asking for is already a feature. Go into the options section and choose the option where the patches are left on the Microsoft site and not downloaded to yours. That way your WSUS server just has the config, the policies, and the approved patches. Then the clients (the ones you mentioned on the WAN) will download from Microsoft (only the ones you've approved) and not from your server.
From bsa - 7/15/05 10:06 AM I'd like to see a way to synchronize settings with an upstream server but download content directly from Microsoft. Our WAN is all VPN. We want to control the required updates from a single point to maintain consistency, but with a VPN architecture it is much more effective for us to download content for each server directly from MS. That way we are only using one sites connection for the download instead of both the source and the target sites. From pepitoe - 6/30/05 10:22 AM - an editable comments column for computers for easier identification - rename groups rather than having to delete them and start again - a way to delete custom view filters - Mixed should be in the Approval options in the View filter From hadadink - 6/27/05 7:59 AM Need a /installnow client switch. I use the /detectnow all the time, and sometimes the /resetauthorization switch...but I would love to have a /installnow switch for the clients that are set to 3. I have lots of servers that are set to 3, download and notify... The problem is that we HAVE to login to each one and this takes too much time. I want them to be installed manual, but I'd love to be able to do them ALL manually at the same time... Maybe an even better option would be to have a /installnow and /r for reboot also... This could be done from MOM or a batch file, script, or using psexec @file.txt on multiple computers... This would be very helpful... From maximillianx - 6/16/05 2:58 PM 'nother column: Download size. If I'm going to unleash holy hell on my network :) I'd like to know how much data I'm spewing forth! Ability to export to CSV/XLS: It's great to be able to print these things, but I want to be able to generate a history on my data. From maximillianx - 6/15/05 11:52 AM Columns Additional columns to sort by - KB# MS0x etc. Would make searching through the list of updates a bit easier. Patch Groups Similar to Shavlik, I would like to create a patch group, so I can report on a subset of updates rather than looking at each patch status report and seeing if my computers fall in there or not. I would think this would be relatively easy to implement. Rob From dcoleman - 5/24/05 8:59 AM It would be nice if WSUS clients could be pointed to multiple sources for updates in a hierarchical fashion (Primary, Secondary) similar to DNS, WINS, etc. For example, I'd like to have laptops get their updates from an internal WSUS server when they're on my network, but automatically "fall back" to getting updates from windowsupdate.microsoft.com when they're on the road.
From paulgear - 5/12/05 5:01 PM I would like customisable columns in the computers screens, including
the ability to add columns for IP addresses and BIOS ids, and sort them
correctly (i.e. IPs sorted in proper numeric order, not alphabetically).
From Quaternion - 4/19/05 6:12 AM I nice part to add would be the option for wake on LAN so the updates will be installed at night after sending a WOL signal to the PC's that needs to be updated. When the updates are finished installing the PC will shut down instead of reboot. From joedavis - 4/16/05 4:52 AM It would be great to have the ability to change synchronization options so that the WSUS server(s) will synchronize with Microsoft on certain days at a specific time, rather than just a certain hour every day.
From swinefeld - 4/8/05 12:05 AM I'd like to see some sort of baseline/platform options support. As in, any workstations put on the network are going to be 2000-SP4/XP-SP2 with IE6-SP1 (or forced to that level through policy), so I'd rather not have to even deal with the all the stuff that came before, tracking supercedence etc. I realize that large operations are likely to have a much bigger mix, but it would be nice to have the choice.
From Skatterbrain - 3/26/05 9:39 AM Say, what happened with the "Decline superceded updates" option checkbox? That was kind of nice in WUS b2. I don't see it in WSUS. I'm supposed to manually find them and decline them now? Ugh. Sounds like manual labor. If I'm missing it (right in front of my deformed nose most likely), someone please point me in the right direction?
From Skatterbrain - 3/24/05 8:42 PM In WSUS RC it's still a little awkward to get from the report that shows updates needed back to the update itself to approve it for installation. I wish that was linked more directly. Also, in the filter options, it would be nice to have "Not Declined" so I can see everything not declined (he says fading off quietly). :) Last Modified 5/1/08 5:33 AM | Hide Tools |